Services / Red Teaming
Test the response, not the wall.
You already know some things are vulnerable. What you don't know is whether anyone would notice, how fast, and whether the person who noticed could do anything about it. That's the question this answers.
The difference
The finding is not the point. The timeline is.
A penetration test asks whether a door opens. A red team assumes doors open, and asks what happens next — because in every real breach, something was vulnerable and the actual damage was decided by how long the intruder stayed unnoticed.
You get a minute-by-minute timeline: what we did, what your tooling saw, what it escalated, and where the chain of response broke. That's a training document and a budget argument in one, which a vulnerability list has never been.
How it works
Run the way an adversary runs.
-
01
Pick a real objective
Not "get domain admin" — something with consequence, agreed with you up front: move the money, read the board pack, stop the line.
-
02
Get in quietly
Phishing, exposed services, supply chain, physical where in scope. First access is a means, not the trophy.
-
03
Live in it
Persistence, lateral movement and privilege escalation over days or weeks, deliberately testing the seams between your tools.
-
04
Replay it together
A joint walkthrough with your defenders, mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, showing every action next to whether it was seen.
What you get
Evidence your defenders can train on.
-
Attack timeline
Every action, timestamped, beside what your stack detected — and what it didn't.
-
Detection gap analysis
Mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, so the gaps translate into specific detections worth building.
-
Response critique
Where escalation stalled, decisions waited, or a playbook didn't survive contact.
-
Purple-team replay
A working session with your team, running the chain again with the lights on.
Confident you'd catch it?
Good. Let's find out where the confidence is earned and where it's assumed.